Library
PubMed Central Open Access
research article
Professional
Open access

Primary care anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibody testing for rheumatoid arthritis and accompanying pathway redesign reduces unnecessary referrals

Source: PubMed Central Open Access, NCBI / U.S. National Library of Medicine

Rheumatology Advances in PracticeLast synced 9/7/2026Status: syncedPMID: 42701801 pmidDOI: 10.1093/rap/rkag103

Abstract Objectives Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies are alternative diagnostic tests for RA with similar sensitivity. Anti-CCP antibodies have improved specificity compared with RF and so should result in fewer false positives. A retrospective, observational study was conducted following a change in the primary care pathway and test for inflammatory arthritis from RF to anti-CCP antibodies, assessing real-world impact on referrals. s1 Methods The primary care test was changed from RF to anti-CCP antibodies as part of a service development in East and North Devon, UK (population 463 000). Data were monitored post-implementation from 1 March to 31 August 2024. Anti-CCP antibody testing was made available to primary care. General practitioner order communications automatically redirected requests for RF to anti-CCP antibodies. Local referral guidelines were implemented recommending anti-CCP antibodies to support referral decisions but not for rule-out of inflammatory arthritis. The equivalent 6-month period from 2023 when RF was the primary test for inflammatory arthritis was used for comparison. s2 Results Positive tests decreased from 10.6% with RF to 3.9% with anti-CCP antibodies. This led to 57 (39%) fewer referrals following a positive test. The false positive rate among those referred to rheumatology decreased from 59% (91/148) with RF to 32% (29/91) with anti-CCP antibodies. Anti-CCP antibodies and RF detected similar num

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies are alternative diagnostic tests for RA with similar sensitivity. Anti-CCP antibodies have improved specificity compared with RF and so should result in fewer false positives. A retrospective, observational study was conducted following a change in the primary care pathway and test for inflammatory arthritis from RF to anti-CCP antibodies, assessing real-world impact on referrals. s1 Methods The primary care test was changed from RF to anti-CCP antibodies as part of a service development in East and North Devon, UK (population 463 000). Data were monitored post-implementation from 1 March to 31 August 2024. Anti-CCP antibody testing was made available to primary care. General practitioner order communications automatically redirected requests for RF to anti-CCP antibodies. Local referral guidelines were implemented recommending anti-CCP antibodies to support referral decisions but not for rule-out of inflammatory arthritis. The equivalent 6-month period from 2023 when RF was the primary test for inflammatory arthritis was used for comparison. s2 Results Positive tests decreased from 10.6% with RF to 3.9% with anti-CCP antibodies. This led to 57 (39%) fewer referrals following a positive test. The false positive rate among those referred to rheumatology decreased from 59% (91/148) with RF to 32% (29/91) with anti-CCP antibodies. Anti-CCP antibodies and RF detected similar numbers of inflammatory arthritis cases with a case yield of 2.1% for both tests. s3 Conclusion Replacement of RF with anti-CCP antibodies within a redesigned inflammatory arthritis pathway reduced unnecessary rheumatology referrals. This could help oversubscribed services reduce waiting times and thus contribute to timely diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis. s4

Educational only
This information is for general education and is not medical advice. Always talk to a licensed U.S. clinician about your situation, medications, or treatment decisions.