Library
PubMed Central Open Access
research article
Professional
Open access

Pneumatic Versus Holmium:YAG Laser Lithotripsy During True Tubeless Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Source: PubMed Central Open Access, NCBI / U.S. National Library of Medicine

CureusLast synced 9/3/2026Status: syncedPMID: 42683479 pmidDOI: 10.7759/cureus.113818

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare stone-free and safety outcomes between pneumatic and Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy in patients undergoing true tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) for renal calculi. Materials and methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted including 34 consecutive adult patients who underwent true tubeless mini-PCNL between 2021 and 2024 at a tertiary referral center. Procedures were performed using a standardized 16-Fr tract with an 11/12-Fr operating sheath. Stone fragmentation was achieved using either pneumatic lithotripsy (Swiss LithoClast®) or a 100-W Holmium:YAG laser with a 200-µm fiber. The lithotripsy modality was selected according to surgeon preference, equipment availability, and intraoperative considerations. Stone-free status was defined as the absence of residual fragments or residual fragments <3 mm on non-contrast computed tomography performed at least 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome was the CT-confirmed stone-free rate. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, postoperative sepsis, and 30-day complications. Results: Thirty-four patients were included, with 17 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Endoscopic stone-free rates were achieved in 15 (88.2%) and 14 (82.4%) patients in the pneumatic and Holmium:YAG laser groups, respectively (p=0.628). CT-confirmed stone-free rates were achieved in 12 (70.6%) and nine (52.9%) patients, respectively (p=0.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare stone-free and safety outcomes between pneumatic and Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy in patients undergoing true tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) for renal calculi. Materials and methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted including 34 consecutive adult patients who underwent true tubeless mini-PCNL between 2021 and 2024 at a tertiary referral center. Procedures were performed using a standardized 16-Fr tract with an 11/12-Fr operating sheath. Stone fragmentation was achieved using either pneumatic lithotripsy (Swiss LithoClast®) or a 100-W Holmium:YAG laser with a 200-µm fiber. The lithotripsy modality was selected according to surgeon preference, equipment availability, and intraoperative considerations. Stone-free status was defined as the absence of residual fragments or residual fragments <3 mm on non-contrast computed tomography performed at least 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome was the CT-confirmed stone-free rate. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, postoperative sepsis, and 30-day complications. Results: Thirty-four patients were included, with 17 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Endoscopic stone-free rates were achieved in 15 (88.2%) and 14 (82.4%) patients in the pneumatic and Holmium:YAG laser groups, respectively (p=0.628). CT-confirmed stone-free rates were achieved in 12 (70.6%) and nine (52.9%) patients, respectively (p=0.290). Estimated blood loss and postoperative complications were comparable between groups. One patient (5.9%) in the Holmium:YAG laser group developed a Clavien-Dindo grade IV postoperative hemorrhagic complication requiring blood transfusion. Postoperative sepsis occurred in 0 (0.0%) patients. Conclusions: In this homogeneous cohort of patients undergoing true tubeless mini-PCNL, Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy did not demonstrate superior stone-free or safety outcomes compared with pneumatic lithotripsy. Both modalities achieved comparable clinical outcomes and represent effective treatment options for appropriately selected patients.

Educational only
This information is for general education and is not medical advice. Always talk to a licensed U.S. clinician about your situation, medications, or treatment decisions.