Library
PubMed Central Open Access
research article
Professional
Open access

Online Presentation of No‐, Low‐ and Full‐Strength Alcohol in Three New Zealand Online Alcohol Retailers: Implications for Harm‐Reduction Policy

Source: PubMed Central Open Access, NCBI / U.S. National Library of Medicine

Drug and Alcohol ReviewLast synced 9/10/2026Status: syncedPMID: 42705677 pmidDOI: 10.1111/dar.70240

ABSTRACT Introduction The availability of no‐ and low‐alcohol (NOLO) products could lead to reduced consumption of full‐strength alcohol, although concerns exist about their marketing and links to full‐strength alcohol brands. This study examines how NOLO beer and cider products are structured, categorised and presented, relative to their full‐strength alcohol counterparts, within online alcohol retailers in New Zealand. dar70240-sec-0001 Methods Between July–September 2024 an observational audit was conducted of three nationwide online alcohol retailers (two supermarkets, one liquor retailer). Retailer websites were assessed under relevant search and browsing conditions, examining the availability, visibility and co‐presentation of NOLO and full‐strength alcohol products, the proportion of NOLO brands with a full‐strength alcohol variant and the visibility of information about alcohol content. dar70240-sec-0002 Results Full‐strength alcohol products appeared on two of the three retailers' home pages, whereas NOLOs were absent. NOLOs comprised 7%–9% of beers/ciders offered. Between 2% and 11% of full‐strength alcohol beers/ciders were miscategorised as NOLOs. Searches using NOLO‐related terms returned 11%–100% full‐strength alcohol products. NOLO products were less prominent than full‐strength alcohol products across browsing and search conditions, and usually lower cost. Most NOLOs (83%–92%) were line extensions of full‐strength alcohol brands. Between 14% and 33% of NOLO pr

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction The availability of no‐ and low‐alcohol (NOLO) products could lead to reduced consumption of full‐strength alcohol, although concerns exist about their marketing and links to full‐strength alcohol brands. This study examines how NOLO beer and cider products are structured, categorised and presented, relative to their full‐strength alcohol counterparts, within online alcohol retailers in New Zealand. dar70240-sec-0001 Methods Between July–September 2024 an observational audit was conducted of three nationwide online alcohol retailers (two supermarkets, one liquor retailer). Retailer websites were assessed under relevant search and browsing conditions, examining the availability, visibility and co‐presentation of NOLO and full‐strength alcohol products, the proportion of NOLO brands with a full‐strength alcohol variant and the visibility of information about alcohol content. dar70240-sec-0002 Results Full‐strength alcohol products appeared on two of the three retailers' home pages, whereas NOLOs were absent. NOLOs comprised 7%–9% of beers/ciders offered. Between 2% and 11% of full‐strength alcohol beers/ciders were miscategorised as NOLOs. Searches using NOLO‐related terms returned 11%–100% full‐strength alcohol products. NOLO products were less prominent than full‐strength alcohol products across browsing and search conditions, and usually lower cost. Most NOLOs (83%–92%) were line extensions of full‐strength alcohol brands. Between 14% and 33% of NOLO products lacked clear alcohol content information. dar70240-sec-0003 Discussion and Conclusion Inconsistencies in the categorisation, presentation and labelling of NOLO and full‐strength alcohols were observed in all three online alcohol retailers. These features shape how consumers will encounter alcohol products online and may contribute to consumer confusion. Policy measures to improve the clarity and consistency of online alcohol retail presentation are warranted. dar70240-sec-0004 Key Points Full‐strength alcohol products frequently appeared within no‐ and low‐alcohol (NOLO) related browsing categories and search results, reflecting inconsistent categorisation and presentation practises across retailer websites. dar70240-li-0001 Across three retailers, over 80% of NOLO beers and ciders were line extensions of full‐strength alcohol brands. dar70240-li-0002 Compared to full‐strength alcohol, NOLOs were lower cost, although sales sometimes discounted the price of full‐strength alcohol below the price of NOLOs. dar70240-li-0003 Across the audited websites, information on the alcohol content of products categorised as NOLOs was sometimes missing, not clearly visible or not easily accessible. dar70240-li-0004 Findings highlight inconsistencies in how NOLO and full‐strength alcohol products are categorised and presented in some online retail environments in New Zealand. dar70240-li-0005 bullet dar70240-list-0001 highlights dar70240-abs-5002

Educational only
This information is for general education and is not medical advice. Always talk to a licensed U.S. clinician about your situation, medications, or treatment decisions.