Library
PubMed
research article
Professional

Erythroferrone in β-thalassemia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Source: PubMed, NCBI / U.S. National Library of Medicine

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistrySaboor Muhammad, Abass KhaledPublished 6/12/2026Last synced 6/18/2026Status: syncedPMID: 42285340DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2026.121179

Erythroferrone suppresses hepcidin and has emerged as a candidate biomarker of ineffective erythropoiesis in &#x3b2;-thalassemia. No prior meta-analysis has quantitatively synthesised circulating ERFE data. A PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420261347288) searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science up to March 2026. Hedges' g was pooled using random-effects REML; correlation outcomes were Fisher z-transformed. Seven pre-specified sensitivity analyses evaluated robustness. Thirteen studies (975 patients; 350 controls; 2019-2026) were included. Six met primary meta-analysis criteria (k&#xa0;=&#xa0;6; n&#xa0;=&#xa0;541), yielding a large pooled effect (g&#xa0;=&#xa0;2.700; 95%CI: 0.906-4.495; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.003; I&#xa0;=&#xa0;96.1%), with all seven sensitivity analyses remaining significant (g range: 1.882-3.028). The ERFE-hepcidin pool demonstrated a significant inverse association with zero heterogeneity (r&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.342; 95%CI: -0.472, -0.197; p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001; I&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0%). A significant positive ERFE-ferritin correlation was identified (r&#xa0;=&#xa0;+0.439; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0002); ERFE-hemoglobin was non-significant (r&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.205; 95%CI: -0.515, +0.153; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.260). Four studies reported formal ROC analyses yielding a weighted pooled AUC of 0.872 (range: 0.766-0.940). One study documented a 51% ERFE increase following luspatercept (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.0001). ERFE is markedly elevated in &#x3b2;-thal

Abstract

Erythroferrone suppresses hepcidin and has emerged as a candidate biomarker of ineffective erythropoiesis in &#x3b2;-thalassemia. No prior meta-analysis has quantitatively synthesised circulating ERFE data. A PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420261347288) searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science up to March 2026. Hedges' g was pooled using random-effects REML; correlation outcomes were Fisher z-transformed. Seven pre-specified sensitivity analyses evaluated robustness. Thirteen studies (975 patients; 350 controls; 2019-2026) were included. Six met primary meta-analysis criteria (k&#xa0;=&#xa0;6; n&#xa0;=&#xa0;541), yielding a large pooled effect (g&#xa0;=&#xa0;2.700; 95%CI: 0.906-4.495; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.003; I&#xa0;=&#xa0;96.1%), with all seven sensitivity analyses remaining significant (g range: 1.882-3.028). The ERFE-hepcidin pool demonstrated a significant inverse association with zero heterogeneity (r&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.342; 95%CI: -0.472, -0.197; p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001; I&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0%). A significant positive ERFE-ferritin correlation was identified (r&#xa0;=&#xa0;+0.439; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0002); ERFE-hemoglobin was non-significant (r&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.205; 95%CI: -0.515, +0.153; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.260). Four studies reported formal ROC analyses yielding a weighted pooled AUC of 0.872 (range: 0.766-0.940). One study documented a 51% ERFE increase following luspatercept (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.0001). ERFE is markedly elevated in &#x3b2;-thalassemia and inversely correlates with hepcidin in a homogeneous and reproducible manner. Assay standardisation and prospective validation are required before clinical implementation.

Educational only
This information is for general education and is not medical advice. Always talk to a licensed U.S. clinician about your situation, medications, or treatment decisions.