Library
PubMed
research article
Professional

Causal Relationship Between Gut Microbiome and Infectious Mononucleosis: Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Reveals Infectious Mononucleosis-Driven Gut Dysbiosis.

Source: PubMed, NCBI / U.S. National Library of Medicine

CureusLi Yuanxiao, Wang Jiayan, Zhang Ni, et al.Published 7/1/2026Last synced 8/13/2026Status: syncedPMID: 42544154DOI: 10.7759/cureus.111983

Background To assess bidirectionality between gut microbiota and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-driven infectious mononucleosis (IM), we conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR). Given IM's heterogeneous symptoms and evidence linking microbiota to viral infection, this may inform novel prevention or treatment strategies. Methods We employed a bidirectional two-sample MR framework using summary data from 207 gut microbial taxa and 205 metabolic pathways (Dutch Microbiome Project, n = 7,738) and the FinnGen consortium. Causality was assessed via inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, and mode-based estimation. Statistical significance was set at P <0.05 (Bonferroni-corrected), with instruments validated by F-statistics >10. Heterogeneity and pleiotropy were evaluated using Cochran's Q, MR-Egger intercepts, and leave-one-out analyses. Results Forward MR: Several bacterial pathways and taxa were&#xa0;positively associated with IM risk. These include the de novo purine nucleotide biosynthesis II superpathway (odds ratio (OR) = 1.246, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.026-1.514, P = 0.027), anhydromuropeptide recycling (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.014-1.517, P = 0.036), the superpathway of unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis () (OR = 1.194, 95% CI: 1.019-1.4, P = 0.028),&#xa0;(OR = 1.109, 95% CI: 1.02-1.206, P = 0.016), and&#xa0;(OR = 1.108, 95% CI: 1.017-1.207, P = 0.019). Conversely, several taxa and pathways exhibited protective effects. These include the glucose

Abstract

Background To assess bidirectionality between gut microbiota and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-driven infectious mononucleosis (IM), we conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR). Given IM's heterogeneous symptoms and evidence linking microbiota to viral infection, this may inform novel prevention or treatment strategies. Methods We employed a bidirectional two-sample MR framework using summary data from 207 gut microbial taxa and 205 metabolic pathways (Dutch Microbiome Project, n = 7,738) and the FinnGen consortium. Causality was assessed via inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, and mode-based estimation. Statistical significance was set at P <0.05 (Bonferroni-corrected), with instruments validated by F-statistics >10. Heterogeneity and pleiotropy were evaluated using Cochran's Q, MR-Egger intercepts, and leave-one-out analyses. Results Forward MR: Several bacterial pathways and taxa were&#xa0;positively associated with IM risk. These include the de novo purine nucleotide biosynthesis II superpathway (odds ratio (OR) = 1.246, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.026-1.514, P = 0.027), anhydromuropeptide recycling (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.014-1.517, P = 0.036), the superpathway of unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis () (OR = 1.194, 95% CI: 1.019-1.4, P = 0.028),&#xa0;(OR = 1.109, 95% CI: 1.02-1.206, P = 0.016), and&#xa0;(OR = 1.108, 95% CI: 1.017-1.207, P = 0.019). Conversely, several taxa and pathways exhibited protective effects. These include the glucose-1-phosphate degradation pathway (G1P-DP) (OR = 0.852, 95% CI: 0.731-0.994, P = 0.042), heme biosynthesis from glutamate (OR = 0.809, 95% CI: 0.676-0.969, P = 0.032), the superpathway of L-tyrosine biosynthesis (OR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.811-0.998, P = 0.046), the flavin biosynthesis I pathway (OR = 0.817, 95% CI: 0.672-0.993, P = 0.042),&#xa0;(OR = 0.869, 95% CI: 0.779-0.968, P = 0.011), and&#xa0;(OR = 0.844, 95% CI: 0.731-0.937, P = 0.020). Reverse MR: IM was found to causally alter gut microbiome composition. IM was associated with a decrease&#xa0;of beneficial genera such as&#xa0;(OR = 0.901, 95% CI: 0.837-0.982, P = 0.016) and&#xa0;(OR = 0.915, 95% CI: 0.841-0.995, P = 0.038), as well as&#xa0;(OR = 0.876, 95% CI: 0.775-0.991, P = 0.035). Conversely, IM increased the risk of enrichment for&#xa0;(OR = 1.107, 95% CI: 1.016-1.210, P = 0.020) and&#xa0;(OR = 1.096, 95% CI: 1.000-1.200, P = 0.048). Regarding metabolic pathways, IM increased the risk of polyamine biosynthesis II (OR = 1.123, 95% CI: 1.016-1.243, P = 0.024), L-lysine biosynthesis II (OR = 1.094, 95% CI: 1.008-1.118, P = 0.031), and L-lysine biosynthesis VI (OR = 1.083, 95% CI: 1.000-1.172, P = 0.048), while showing a protective association with L-rhamnose degradation I (OR = 0.922, 95% CI: 0.851-0.999, P = 0.046). Conclusion This study provides genetic evidence of a bidirectional causal relationship between the gut microbiome and IM. These findings suggest that IM may influence gut microbial ecosystem structure, characterized by a reduction in beneficial symbionts (e.g.,) and an enrichment of potentially pro-inflammatory taxa (e.g.,). These findings may inform future microbiota-targeted interventions or risk stratification strategies for EBV-related diseases. Limitations include the European ancestry of study populations and the need for mechanistic validation.

Educational only
This information is for general education and is not medical advice. Always talk to a licensed U.S. clinician about your situation, medications, or treatment decisions.