Library
PubMed
research article
Professional

Bowel Function After J-Pouch May Be More Complex Than Previously Appreciated: A Comprehensive Analysis to Highlight Existing Knowledge Gaps.

Source: PubMed, NCBI / U.S. National Library of Medicine

Diseases of the colon and rectumLee Grace C, Cavallaro Paul M, Savitt Lieba R, et al.Published 2/1/2020Last synced 8/24/2026Status: syncedPMID: 31914113DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001543

Functional outcomes following J-pouch for ulcerative colitis have been studied, but lack standardization in which symptoms are reported. Furthermore, the selection of symptoms studied has not been patient centered. This study aimed to utilize a validated bowel function survey to determine which symptoms are present after J-pouch creation, and whether patients display a functional profile similar to low anterior resection syndrome. This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained single-center database. This study was conducted at the colorectal surgery center of a tertiary care academic hospital PATIENTS:: Included were 159 patients with J-pouch, &#x2265;6 months after ileostomy reversal. The primary outcomes were individual answers to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument. The original Bowel Function Instrument validation cohort was used as an historical comparison (n = 127). The mean total Bowel Function Instrument score for the J-pouch cohort was 59.9&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;9.7 compared with a reported average score of 63.7&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;11.6 for patients with low anterior resection in the validation cohort (p < 0.001), indicating worse bowel function in patients with J-pouch. When evaluating the Bowel Function Instrument subscales, patients with J-pouch reported frequency subscale scores of 18.2&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.8, diet scores of 12.2&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.8, and urgency scores of 15.9&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.7

Abstract

Functional outcomes following J-pouch for ulcerative colitis have been studied, but lack standardization in which symptoms are reported. Furthermore, the selection of symptoms studied has not been patient centered. This study aimed to utilize a validated bowel function survey to determine which symptoms are present after J-pouch creation, and whether patients display a functional profile similar to low anterior resection syndrome. This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained single-center database. This study was conducted at the colorectal surgery center of a tertiary care academic hospital PATIENTS:: Included were 159 patients with J-pouch, &#x2265;6 months after ileostomy reversal. The primary outcomes were individual answers to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument. The original Bowel Function Instrument validation cohort was used as an historical comparison (n = 127). The mean total Bowel Function Instrument score for the J-pouch cohort was 59.9&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;9.7 compared with a reported average score of 63.7&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;11.6 for patients with low anterior resection in the validation cohort (p < 0.001), indicating worse bowel function in patients with J-pouch. When evaluating the Bowel Function Instrument subscales, patients with J-pouch reported frequency subscale scores of 18.2&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.8, diet scores of 12.2&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.8, and urgency scores of 15.9&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.7, compared with 21.7&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;4.5 (p < 0.001), 14.1&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.7 (p < 0.001), and 15.0&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.9 (p = 0.04) for patients undergoing rectal resection. Furthermore, 90.4% of patients with J-pouch state that they are sometimes, rarely, or never able to wait 15 minutes to get to the toilet. In addition, 56.4% of patients report having another bowel movement within 15 minutes of the last bowel movement, sometimes, always, or most of the time, and 50.6% of patients say that they sometimes, rarely, or never feel like their bowels have been totally emptied after a bowel movement. This study is limited because it took place at a single center and the Bowel Function Instrument was only validated for patients undergoing rectal resection. Patients that undergo J-pouch surgery exhibit a constellation of bowel function symptoms that is more complex than fecal incontinence and frequency alone, despite the focus on these functional outcomes in the literature. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B73. LA FUNCI&#xd3;N INTESTINAL DESPU&#xc9;S DE LA BOLSA EN J PUEDE SER M&#xc1;S COMPLEJA DE LO QUE SE APRECIABA ANTERIORMENTE: UN AN&#xc1;LISIS EXHAUSTIVO PARA RESALTAR LAS BRECHAS DE CONOCIMIENTO EXISTENTES: Se han estudiado los resultados funcionales despu&#xe9;s de la bolsa en J para la colitis ulcerosa, pero carecen de estandarizaci&#xf3;n en la que se informen los s&#xed;ntomas. Adem&#xe1;s, la selecci&#xf3;n de los s&#xed;ntomas estudiados no se ha centrado en el paciente.Utilizar una encuesta validada de la funci&#xf3;n intestinal para determinar qu&#xe9; s&#xed;ntomas est&#xe1;n presentes despu&#xe9;s de la bolsa en J y si los pacientes muestran un perfil funcional similar al s&#xed;ndrome de resecci&#xf3;n anterior baja.An&#xe1;lisis retrospectivo de una base de datos de un solo centro mantenida prospectivamente.Centro de cirug&#xed;a colorrectal de un hospital acad&#xe9;mico de atenci&#xf3;n terciaria.159 pacientes con bolsa en J, &#x2265;6 meses despu&#xe9;s de la reversi&#xf3;n de ileostom&#xed;a.Instrumento para la funci&#xf3;n intestinal del "Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center"; cohorte de validaci&#xf3;n original de instrumentos de funci&#xf3;n intestinal utilizada como comparaci&#xf3;n hist&#xf3;rica (n = 127).La puntuaci&#xf3;n media total del instrumento de funci&#xf3;n intestinal para la cohorte de bolsa J fue 59.9&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;9.7 en comparaci&#xf3;n con un puntaje promedio reportado de 63.7&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;11.6 para pacientes con resecci&#xf3;n anterior baja en la cohorte de validaci&#xf3;n (p < 0.001), lo que indica peor funci&#xf3;n intestinal en pacientes con bolsa en J. Al evaluar las subescalas del instrumento de funci&#xf3;n intestinal, los pacientes con bolsa en J informaron puntuaciones de subescala de frecuencia de 18.2&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.8, puntuaciones de dieta de 12.2&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.8 y puntuaciones de urgencia de 15.9&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.7, en comparaci&#xf3;n con 21.7&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;4.5 (p < 0.001), 14.1&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.7 (p < 0.001) y 15.0&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.9 (p = 0.04) respectivamente para pacientes con resecci&#xf3;n rectal. Adem&#xe1;s, el 90.4% de los pacientes con bolsa en J afirman que a veces, rara vez o nunca pueden esperar 15 minutos para llegar al ba&#xf1;o. Adem&#xe1;s, el 56.4% de los pacientes reportan haber tenido otra evacuaci&#xf3;n intestinal dentro de los 15 minutos posteriores a la &#xfa;ltima evacuaci&#xf3;n intestinal, a veces, siempre o la mayor parte del tiempo, y el 50.6% de los pacientes dicen que a veces, rara vez o nunca sienten que sus intestinos han sido vaciados totalmente despu&#xe9;s de una evacuaci&#xf3;n intestinal.Estudio en un solo centro, instrumento de funci&#xf3;n intestinal validado solo para pacientes con resecci&#xf3;n rectalLos pacientes que se someten a una bolsa en J exhiben una constelaci&#xf3;n de s&#xed;ntomas de la funci&#xf3;n intestinal que es m&#xe1;s compleja que la incontinencia fecal y la frecuencia sola, a pesar del enfoque en estos resultados funcionales en la literatura.Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B73. (Traducci&#xf3;n-Dr. Gonzalo Federico Hagerman).

Educational only
This information is for general education and is not medical advice. Always talk to a licensed U.S. clinician about your situation, medications, or treatment decisions.